The working environment of upper secondary school teachers during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24270/netla.2022.12

Keywords:

stress at work, working environment, working duties, communication, support, upper secondary education

Abstract

The working environment in upper secondary schools changed drastically with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. A ban on social gatherings was established in Iceland in March 2020 and all schoolwork shifted to on-line learning almost overnight; this lasted throughout the spring semester and continued with various restrictions in the fall of 2020. Upper secondary school teachers answered a questionnaire in May 2020, aimed at mapping the changes to working conditions during the spring semester and the shift into emergency remote teaching (Barbour et al., 2020). At the end of the fall semester, a follow-up questionnaire was sent. The data used in the current paper derive from these questionnaires. The aim is to investigate how teachers at the upper secondary level performed their duties under the new circumstances in 2020, especially during the first COVID lockdown in spring but also as the pandemic continued. Special emphasis is laid on how they experienced their working conditions, e.g., in terms of their definition of duties, stress, collaboration and administrative obligations, as well as their interaction with students and their parents. The support provided to teachers during the first stages of the pandemic, both technological, pedagogical and social is analyzed. The aim is to add to the gradually emerging knowledge base by shedding light on the work of upper secondary teachers during the first waves of the pandemic. The first results show that the teaching profession underwent radical changes during the first period of the pandemic (Súsanna Margrét Gestsdóttir et al., 2020). Upper secondary teachers felt an increased pressure and stress at work and perceived their work as more complicated than before. The experience of stress increased during the fall semester, even though the teachers reported they had a better handle on the work. The data show an important gender difference, as female teachers seem to have been primary caregivers in the homes and consequently found it more strenuous to attend to their teaching duties as well. More collaboration with colleagues during the pandemic was reported and administrative meetings were more frequent. The collaboration with colleagues proved a crucial factor when coping with the recurring changes of working conditions. This was generally viewed as beneficial to their work by a large majority of teachers. Communication with students and parents increased overall and over time, especially according to female teachers, which may have added to the increased pressure at work. Moreover, most participants believed students experienced more psychological stress during the pandemic, a perception that only heightened over time. However, they also believed that schools had adjusted their work practices to accommodate students during these challenging times. The results evoke important questions concerning teachers’ working conditions. The rapid professional development undertaken by teachers led to the majority of them adopting more varied teaching approaches than before the pandemic. Nevertheless, this was accompanied by a higher level of stress and insecurity. This may carry several implications. Teacher education needs to take these changed circumstances into account and prepare future teachers for the possibilities of hybrid teaching and increased flexibility and differentiation. Both experienced and newly qualified teachers need to have access to professional development that supports them. The time and opportunities that teachers need for collaboration and peer support must be included in their work. Reflecting on the situation in Iceland during the first stages of the pandemic can serve as a basis for comparison with teachers’ working conditions in other countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Guðrún Ragnarsdóttir, University of Iceland - School of education
    Guðrún Ragnarsdóttir (gudrunr@hi.is) is an associate professor at the School of Education, University of Iceland. She completed a PhD degree in educational science from the University of Iceland in 2018. Her research area is educational change and policy, educational systems, upper secondary education, and school leadership. Recently her research focus has been on the impact of COVID-19 on upper secondary education.
  • Súsanna Margrét Gestsdóttir, University of Iceland - School of education
    Súsanna Margrét Gestsdóttir (susmar@hi.is) is an assistant professor at the University of Iceland, School of Education. She holds a master’s degree in history and has worked as a history teacher, teacher educator and as a school leader at upper secondary level. She completed a PhD in history teaching at the University of Amsterdam. In her work she emphasizes the cooperation of the university and teachers’ field of work.
  • Amalía Björnsdóttir, University of Iceland - School of education
    Amalía Björnsdóttir (amaliabj@hi.is) is a professor at the Faculty of Health Promotion, Sport and Leisure Studies in the School of Education, University of Iceland. She completed a B.A. degree in psychology from the University of Iceland in 1991, and a Ph.D. from the University of Oklahoma in 1996. Her major research interests are in the areas of measurement and testing (reading and language development), school management and influence of social factors in education.
  • Elsa Eiríksdóttir, University of Iceland - School of education
    Elsa Eiríksdóttir (elsae@hi.is) is an associate professor at the University of Iceland, School of Education. She completed a BA degree in psychology from the University of Iceland in 1999 and a master’s and a PhD in engineering psychology from Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta in 2007 and 2011, respectively. Her research interests include learning, transfer of training, skill acquisition, upper secondary education, and vocational education and training.

Published

2022-10-31

Issue

Section

Ritrýndar greinar

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>